Tag Archives: Kalelkar Commission

Point-wise clarification to the article of three independent researchers published in The Sangai Express on Nov 22

tag.php

MANY INTERESTING academic salvos have been fired to and fro on the context of why the Meitei community may not have been included in the list of SC/ST under Orders of 1950/1951/1956. While discussing this matter it is crucial that … Continue reading →

Posted in Article | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Meiteis may have missed the bus

tag.php

MUCH WATER has flowed under the bridge since 1950 when an opportunity was there for the Meitei community to be Scheduled Cast or Scheduled Tribe in 1950-51 and also in 1955-56. They have now progressed far beyond the considerations to … Continue reading →

Posted in Article, Headlines, Manipur | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Rebuttal to the article by K Bhogendrajit, General Secy, STDCM on “Meetei/Meitei’s exclusion from ST list-queer controversies”

tag.php

THE SANGAI EXPRESS newspaper on 30.10.2023 published a clarification by K Bhogendrajit, General Secretary of the STDCM (Scheduled Tribe Demand Committee of Manipur) on an article written by Ngaranmi Shimray also published in the same paper on 10.10.2023 raising a … Continue reading →

Posted in Article | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Meiteis’ exclusion from the ST list is by their own choice; Kalelkar Commission Report of 1956

tag.php

(1) KaKa Kalelkar Backward Classes Commission report of 1956, also known as the Second Backward Classes Commission report states that the Meiteis, when given an opportunity to be ST, did not include themselves. This is a startling and undeniable fact! … Continue reading →

Posted in Article, Headlines | Tagged | 4 Comments